How to Determine Interest Rate for Late Payment Obligations in Commercial Transaction?

The most important obligation of the parties to a commercial contract is to deliver or provide services and pay in full and on time as agreed. However, in reality, there are times that one party or the parties fail to perform their payment obligations, causing damages to the other party. In particular, in the case of a breach of the payment obligation, the aggrieved party may request the person having caused damage to pay late payment obligations interest.  Potential dispute on this matter might arise between parties.

 

How to Determine Interest Rate for Late Payment Obligations in Commercial Transaction?

Article 306 of the Commercial Law 2005 provides for the application of the interest rate due to the delay of payment as follows: Where a contract-breaching party delays making payment for goods or payment of service charges and other reasonable fees, the aggrieved party may claim an interest on such delayed payment at the average interest rate applicable to overdue debts in the market at the time of payment for the delayed period, unless otherwise agreed or provided for by law.

The interest rate for late payment of obligations in commercial business is applied according to the average interest rate on overdue debts in the market at the time of payment corresponding to the late payment period, unless otherwise agreed or otherwise provided by law.

However, the Commercial Law 2005 at that time did not have a specific regulation on the average interest rate of overdue debts on the market. The Resolution No. 01/2019/NQ-HDTP has detailed instructions on this interest rate. When determining the interest on late payments, the Court shall determine the interest rate on late payments on the basis of average interest rates on overdue debts announced by at least 03 (three) commercial banks (such as Vietcombank, VietinBank, Agribank, etc.) whose headquarters, branch or transaction office is located in the same province or central-affiliated city where the headquarters of the Court in charge of the case is located at the payment date (the date of first-instance trial), except otherwise agreed upon by the parties or regulated by laws.

In case of late payment liabilities defined in a contract which includes the parties’ agreement on interest payment, the judgment debtor is liable to pay interest on the outstanding judgment debt at the agreed interest rate which must be conformable with applicable laws; if the agreed interest rate is not available, the Court shall decide application of the interest rate prescribed in Clause 2 Article 468 of the 2015 Civil Code. In case interests are charged on amounts payable to the state budget as regulated by laws, the judgment debtor is liable to pay an interest on the judgment debt arrears calculated at the interest rate prescribed in Article 357 or Article 468 of the 2015 Civil Code, unless otherwise prescribed by laws.

In order to protect the best interest of parties, it is important to consult with dispute lawyers in Vietnam for advice.

ANT Lawyers is a law firm in Vietnam, recognized by Legal500, IFLR1000. We are an exclusive Vietnam member of Prea Legal, the global law firm network covering more than 150 jurisdictions. The firm provides a range of legal services to multinational and domestic clients.

 

Read More

When a Contract is Invalid Due to Non-compliance with Form?

Generally, contracts for sale and purchase of goods and service contract shall be expressed in verbal or written form or established with specific acts. For types of contract which must be made in writing provided by law, such contract must comply with such form regulation. Particularly, contract for international purchase and sale of goods shall be conducted on the basis of written contracts or other forms of equal legal validity.

 

Contract dispute law firm in Vietnam

There are two cases of non-compliance with form: (i) form of contract is not in accordance with the law and; (ii) contract violates against regulations on notarizing or authorization. It should be noted that the form of contract shall be the conditions for its effectiveness in cases where it is provided by law. The time limit of requiring the court to declare a contract of non-compliance with form invalid is 02 years, from the establishment date of contract. After such time limit, if there is still no request for declaring contract invalid, such contract still remains valid.

When the contract is invalid, the general rule is restoring everything to its original state and returning to each other what have received. The non-compliance with form contract could be valid de facto contract if recognized by the Court’s decision when one party or the parties has fulfill at least two third of the obligation contract. Obligations means work whereby one or more entities must transfer objects, rights, pay money or provide valuable papers, perform or not perform certain work for the interests of one or more other entities. However, one party or the parties fulfilling at least two third of the obligation contract will not naturally make such contract valid unless there is decision of the the Court to recognize such. Specifically, according to request of one party, after fully considering conditions mentioned above, the Court shall make a decision on recognizing the validity of such contract.

It is important for parties to have a proper contract with terms and conditions that provide sufficient details with consideration of the nature of the business transactions and the possible resolution when potential disputes arise.  Further, the law governing the contract and the dispute resolution clause which refers to court or arbitration choice should be as clear as possible to avoid confusion and extended time resolving the arisen disputes.

We are a law firm in Vietnam with international standard, local expertise and strong international network. We focus on customers’ needs and provide clients with a high quality legal advice and services. For advice or services request, please contact us via email ant@antlawyers.vn, or call us +84 24 730 86 529

 

 

Read More

What Are Fundamental Contract Breaches in Law on Commerce 2005 and CISG 1980?

 

Fundamental breach is atype of contract breach, in which the Law on Commerce 2005 defines that a breach of contract committed by one of the parties is fundamental if it causes damage to the other party to the extent that the other party fails to achieve purpose of contract conclusion. The significant factor that makes the difference between the fundamental and minor breach of contract is the materiality.

 

Fundamental breach is an important foundation for the imposition of trade remedies such as temporary suspension of performance, suspension of performance or contract cancellation when the contract has no specific agreement. Nonetheless, Law on Commerce 2005 does not provide further guidance on fundamental breach. Court or arbitrator has a right to determine whether a breach is fundamental on a case-by-case basis. 

The difference between constitution of a fundamental breach under CIGS 19080 and Law on Commerce 2005 is that: a breach cannot be treated as under CISG 1980 in case the breaching party did not foresee and a reasonable person of the same kind in the same circumstances would not have foreseen such a result. Law on Commerce 2005 does not stipulate factor (iii) as mentioned herein but requires that (1) a breach is made and (2) As set forth in CISG 1980, a breach of contract committed by one of the parties is fundamental if it results in such detriment to the other party as substantially to deprive him of what he is entitled to expect under the contract, unless the party in breach did not foresee and a reasonable person of the same kind in the same circumstances would not have foreseen such a result. CISG also does not provide specific provisions to explain fundamental breach in details. Nonetheless, it can be deemed that in order to constitute a fundamental breach, three following factors need to be met: (i) a breach is made, (ii) detriment resulted from such breach substantially deprives him of what he is entitled to expect under the contract, and (iii) the breach can be foreseen.

damage resulted from such breach causes other party failed to achieve its purpose of contract conclusion to constitute a fundamental breach. The aggrieved party accordingly has a right to impose remedies such as temporary suspension of performance, suspension of performance or contract cancellation.

The consequence factor of fundamental breach in Law on Commerce 2005 is similar to CIGS 1980. In case the purchaser is aggrieved party, what he/she is entitled to expect under the contract is right to receive the goods, to own the goods and to sell to other parties to earn profits or manufacture products or other ways he/she can make a profit. In case the seller is aggrieved party, what he/she is entitled to expect under the contract is right to receive payments, which is profits he/she may earn. The purpose of contract conclusion as provided in Law on Commerce 2005 is same as what the purchaser and seller are entitled to expect under the contract as stipulated in CISG 1980.

ANT Lawyers - a Law firm in Vietnam with international standard, local expertise and strong international network. We focus on customers’ needs and provide clients with a high quality legal advice and services. For advice or service request, please contact us via email ant@antlawyers.vn, or call us +84 24 730 86 529.

 

 

Read More

What is the Effective Date of the Contract and the Time of Ownership Transfer?

One of the most common disputes in contract disputes is the dispute on the effective date of the contract. In order to avoid these disputes, parties should refer to the nature of the validity of the contract as well as distinguish the difference between effective date of the contract and the time of ownership transfer. 

 

Contract dispute law firm in Vietnam

Regarding the effective date, contract shall take effect when contract meets all condition of participants in contract, condition of purpose and contents of contract and condition of form (in case there is regulation). Specifically, participants in contract shall have legal capacity in conformity with such contract and the participation shall base entirely on voluntariy will. For the second condition, the purpose and contents of the contract will not be contrary to the law and social ethics. When there are enough conditions met, a contract legally entered into shall take effect from the time when it is entered into, unless otherwise agreed or otherwise provided by law. From the effective date of the contract, parties shall mutually exercise rights and perform obligations as agreed. A contract may be amended or terminated as agreed by the parties or prescribed by law.

                

Through definition of the effective date of the contract, basic difference between dealing with breaches of contracts which have taken effect and dealing with breaches of invalid contracts can clearly be seen. In invalid contracts, the general remedy rule is restoring everything to its original state and returning to each other what have received. Dealing with breaches of contracts, which have taken effect, must be based on the terms of contract on how to handle such violations. If the contract does not stipulate, the provisions of law on such violation will be applied. It should be noted that there are many regulations from time to time, so the law must be properly applied.

Specially, a contract violating conditions of form validity shall be invalid, except that a party or the parties have fulfill at least two third of the obligations in the contract. A court, at their request, shall issue a decision on recognition of the validity of such contract. It is understood that the contract takes effect after the Court’s judgments or decisions take effect. After the contract takes effect, regulation of law will be applied to determine time of ownership transfer. Contract which can be recognized as valid does not mean that such contract will naturally take effect at the time of fulfilling two third of the obligations. Recognition of the Court is to force parties to continue to execise the obligations of the contract or resolve later disputes according to valid contract.

 

Time of ownership transfer normally belongs to stage of contract enforcement, which is after the effective date of the contract. Except for special contracts (such as contracts for gift), whose time of ownership transfer can be a condition of making contract be valid. With respect to other normal contract, time of ownership transfer is not related to validity condition of contract, which does not make the contract be valid or invalid. It should be noted that time of ownership transfer is stipulated differently with respect to different contract, different property and different specific time. According to Vietnam law of transfer of ownership rights by owner, when an owner transfers ownership rights to another person through a contract for sale and purchase, exchange, gift or loan, other contract of ownership transfer or through inheritance, the ownership rights of the owner shall terminate from the time when the ownership rights of the transferee arise.

The law stipulates that the time of establishing ownership rights and other property-related right shall be determined according to Civil Code 2015 and relevant laws. If there is no relevant regulations of law, the agreement of the parties shall be applied. If there is no either relevant regulations of law or agreement of the parties, the time of establishing ownership rights and other property-related rights shall be the time when the property is transferred. The time when the property is transferred is the time when the obligee or his or her legal representative possesses the property. In case where the property which has been not transferred and there are yield or income arise from that property, such yield or income shall belong to the transferor, unless otherwise agreed.

 

Legal significance of determining time of ownership transfer is to determine who is responsible for the risk and property. According to law, owner shall bear all risks of the property under his or her ownership, unless otherwise agreed or unless otherwise prescribed by laws. The holder of other property-related rights shall bear risks of the property within his or her right scope, unless otherwise agreed with the owner of the property or unless otherwise prescribed by laws.

ANT Lawyers - a Law firm in Vietnam with international standard, local expertise and strong international network. We focus on customers’ needs and provide clients with a high quality legal advice and services. For advice or serive request, please contact us via email ant@antlawyers.vn, or call us +84 24 730 86 529

Let ANT Lawyers help your business in Vietnam.

Read More